|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: This paper examines the evolution of Hong Kong’s
private residential property market over more than four decades, from the early
1980s to the 2025–2026 outlook [1-15], through a quantitative and econometric
lens. Using official annual statistics on private residential price indices,
completions, stock, vacancy, and take-up, this study investigates whether Hong
Kong’s housing market displays identifiable long-run cycles, whether
supply-demand imbalances help explain price movements, and how government
policy has interacted with these dynamics over time. The analysis argues that
Hong Kong’s housing market cannot be explained by a simple “housing shortage”
narrative alone. Instead, long-run price behaviour has been shaped by the
interaction of supply rigidities, demand absorption, inventory pressure,
macro-financial conditions, and policy intervention. The evidence suggests five
broad phases: an upswing and bubble formation period before 1997, a post-crisis
correction from 1998 to 2003, a low-interest-rate recovery from 2004 to 2013, a
period of elevated prices under strong policy intervention from 2014 to 2021,
and a recent adjustment phase from 2022 onward characterized by higher interest
rates, increased completions, and rising vacancy [Appendix 1-4]. The most recent official
statistics are especially important for interpreting the current cycle. In
2024, private residential completions rose sharply to 24,260 units, take-up
reached about 17,310 units, and the vacancy rate increased to 4.5%, equivalent
to about 57,900 vacant units. At the same time, forecast completions remained
high at around 20,860 units for 2025 and 20,100 units for 2026 [1-15]. These
figures suggest that the market has moved away from a regime of acute scarcity
toward one in which structural shortage may still exist in some segments, but
short to medium-term inventory pressure has become much more visible [Appendix
1-4].
Our research paper aims
to help the Hong Kong gov’t and policy maker to make the suitable decision
which therefore contribute to the citizen and the peoples of publics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.11001 |
|
PDF Download |