|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: The European Union must act
– according to the principle of conferral – only in the policy areas, that the
Contracting Parties anchored in the Treaties. Principle of conferral, laid down
in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, constitutes one of fundamental
principles of the EU law. In the light of this principle, the EU acts only
within the limits of the competences that States have conferred upon this
organization in the treaties. These competences are defined in Articles 2–6 of
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In general, it means, that
competences not conferred on the EU by the treaties remain by the national
States.
However, the European Court
of Justice interprets the EU law and – sometimes – it extends the competencies
transferred. It all happens for the sake of free movement of goods, internal
market. This extensive interpretation never happens in the policy areas of
social policy, European Social Charter (1961) and the Community Charter of the
Fundamental Social Rights of Workers (1989). This may astonish, since
the free movement of workers constitutes one of fundamental principles of the
European Union.
Can one understand and interpret the rights of workers without their social rights? This is the question the present paper is going to examine. Further question is the
activism of the European Court of Justice in the area of tax policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.10918 |
|
PDF Download |