|
Title: |
|
Authors:
|
|
Abstract: Stock price volatility exposes short
sellers to potentially unlimited losses, making effective hedging strategies
essential for risk management. This study compares the performance of Vanilla
Call Ratio Backspread and Capped Call Ratio Backspread stratefies in hedging
short stock positions. The analysis utilizes Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) as representatives of high and low volatility
stocks, respectively. Option premiums are determined using the
Black-Scholes-Merton framework, while future stock price movements are
simulated using Geometric Brownian Motion model through Monte Carlo simulation.
The efffectiveness of each stratefy is evaluated based on expected return,
portofolio volatility, probability of loss, and Value at Risk. The empirical
results reveal that capped call options significantly reduce premium costs
compared with vanilla call options. Moreover, the capped call ratio backspread
strategy outperforms both the vanilla call ratio backspread and the unhedged
position by generating higher expected profits and lower risk measures across
both volatility scenarios. These results indicate that the cost savings
associated with capped options outweigh the disadvantages of their limited
payoff structure. Consequently, the capped call ratio backspread strategy
represents a practical and efficient alternative for investors seeking to hedge
stock price movement risk while minimizing hedging costs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2026.10623 |
|
PDF Download |